Enhanced Monitoring of Subsurface CO2 Storage by Visualizing Volume Over Time

| |

monitoring subsurface CO2 storage

The above CoViz 4D image, taken at the 2010 timestep, depicts the CO2 plume (orange) in various layers of the Utsira Formation sliced open against a north-south seismic cross section, at the injection point along well 15/9-A16 (blue tube). The white vertical tower indicates the CO2 injection of 12K million tons at the 2010 timepoint. Behind the seismic cross section is the RESCUE export of the Roxar RMS model. The Sleipner CO2 Reference Dataset is courtesy of The Sleipner Group (Equinor Energy AS, ExxonMobil E&P Norway, AS LOTOS E&P Norge AS, and KUFPEC Norway AS).

With the increasing understanding of global warming and its causes, industries are looking for ways of reducing CO2 from entering the atmosphere to adhere to net zero goals. Subsurface CO injection and storage has been seen as a potential solution for many years for capturing the CO2 emitted from oil and gas production along with heavy industrial sources. Oil and gas reservoirs can provide ideal storage for injected CO2. However, the monitoring of the injection process in the reservoir is extremely important to ensure there is no leakage and unexpected movement of the CO2 post injection.

For years, oil and gas companies have used different softwares for predicting and monitoring production and injection regimes to enhance the recovery from the reservoir. Reservoir engineers can use similar tools to monitor the carbon injection and visualize stored CO2 in the reservoir for safe operation during and after injection.

Components of Subsurface CO2 Storage Monitoring

Successful CO2 injection and storage require a detailed evaluation of the risk associated with the process. Leakage of the injected CO2 is one of the primary public safety concerns. The investigation of geoscientific metrics of the subsurface, especially the rock formation, faults and fractures, porosity, pressure and permeability determines the suitability of the CO2 injection process. Fault location indicates a potential leak path for injected CO2. Appropriate evaluation can help identify these locations and geological orientations which can be useful in developing alternate injection strategies along such paths in case of unexpected leaks.

The containment of injected CO2 is the primary goal of the storage process. With reservoir modeling of the various reservoir data, asset teams can not only access the geological details, such as structural caps and depositional layers but also determine the stress variation, pressure limit, and spill point of the reservoir. This insight into reservoir characteristics can help reservoir engineers to develop a documented, sustainable CO2 storage plan.

Visualizing Volume Over Time

Monitoring subsurface CO2 storage involves measuring time-varying rates of injection into the reservoir, pressure changes, and fill volume. The potential volume of CO2 injected is dependent upon the geology of the reservoir. Visualizing this injected volume over time can lead to an invaluable understanding of CO2 movement and ensures the optimization of the injection and storage process. Furthermore, generating and visualizing predictive models alongside observed data is beneficial in ensuring reservoir behavior is as expected.

The visualization of CO2 volume over time in the subsurface allows asset teams to do the following:

  • analyze the reservoir pressure build-up
  • monitor flow pattern of CO2 within the reservoir
  • monitor faults and fractures for accidental leakage
  • identify fluid migration

Integration of geospatial data, such as seismicity detection and the 4D seismic response, with the injection volume data over time can help the asset team to monitor the CO2 injection operation and flow in the reservoir. With the integration of seismic data into the reservoir model and its monitoring, asset teams can have better understanding of the injection process.

CoViz 4D for Monitoring Subsurface CO2 Storage

CoViz 4D integrates available data to present the history and current state of the reservoir, and can be used to visualize the future predictive reservoir model. Geologic data, injection data ad time lapse seismic data can be integrated into a common environment for improved collaboration and understanding. With these tools, the migration of CO2 through the reservoir can be monitored over time. The monitoring of CO2 injection volume and pressure in context with the geological trap configuration or volume could reduce the over-pressurization risk and help to ensure safe CO2 storage.

By monitoring subsurface CO2 storage over time, asset teams can evaluate and track the injection and storage process and take necessary measures to avoid the risk of leakage. With an enhanced process of monitoring and 3D/4D visualization of subsurface CO2 storage reservoirs, asset teams can develop plans to ensure safe carbon storage and minimize the environmental risks.

CoViz 4D, a data visualization analytics software from Dynamic Graphics Inc., gives operators and recovery engineers the ability to access the time-phased CO2 injection volume data for subsurface CO2 storage. Powerful visualization capabilities enable engineers to explore geological data and develop relationships with injection and storage processes to reduce the risk of induced seismicity. To learn more about CoViz 4D contact our team.


Accommodating Non-Spatial Data Analysis in Decision-Making Workflows

Non-spatial data analysis is just as important as analyzing spatial data during hydrocarbon asset development planning. The combination of non-spatial data and varying streams of spatial data leads to better, faster, and more confident decisions.That’s why data...

Visualizing Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs

Carbonate reservoirs contain a majority of the world's petroleum reserves, and they are one of the more challenging geologic formations to characterize. Within these reservoirs, porosity and permeability can be highly complex and vary widely with little spatial...

Oil and Gas Project Life Cycle: Why Software Agility Matters in Optimizing Field Analysis

In any oil and gas project life cycle significant amounts of data are collected throughout all phases—exploration, drilling, early development, infilling, maturity, and decommissioning. These data are vital to understanding and interpreting field characteristics and...

Enhancing Oil Well Completion Design Through Co-Visualization

Co-visualization of geologic and petrophysical models in conjunction with 4D seismic and offset wells can provide better reservoir understanding for completions to maximize productionNearly every step in the development of a reservoir is critical in achieving the goal...

Improving Upon Standardization in the Oil and Gas Industry

Standardization brings many benefits to the oil and gas industry. The established WITSML standard and the coming OSDU data platform both facilitate easier access, integration, processing, and sharing of data. Leading industry software tools from Schlumberger and...

A Proven Workflow for Modeling Complex Geologic Structures

EarthVision provides a proven application to address the significant challenges presented in modeling complex subsurface geologic structures.Achieving as accurate as possible models of complex geologic structures should be the goal of every geoscientist. Yet, there...

Seismic Reservoir Monitoring Through Visualization

An ideal design, development, and management plan for hydrocarbon asset development comes from having a better understanding of  all known geological and petrophysical aspects of the subsurface. But given the dynamic nature of the reservoir and its attributes, petroleum professionals can encounter some complexities in the process of in-depth analysis.

Share on Social Media