Well Performance Comparison: The Benefits of Integrated Data Visualization & Analysis

| |

well performance comparison
Wellpaths shown with a Gamma Ray model and seismic cross section where different well segments represent areas in which certain criteria are met from intersecting the model. The purple tube represents meeting all three criteria (seismic, Gamma Ray, and Poissons cutoff).

Modern seismic, drilling, and production technologies allow petroleum engineers to generate or acquire substantial volumes of data that characterize well performance—from initial exploration up to yesterday’s production metrics. These data can provide valuable insight when reservoir engineers are considering wells to be drilled into offset prospects or wells drilled to extend an existing producing reservoir. The data are also valuable when comparing the performance of an existing well with historical data of nearby wells to identify and resolve production problems. However, to obtain the maximum benefit from well performance comparisons all of the relevant data need to be:

  • easily accessible by members of the reservoir management team, and
  • integrated and visualized in a common format for comparison.

Conducting Comparisons for Exploration or Extension Drilling

Predrill analysis for new exploration or field extension wells is done to set a range of production expectations. Analysis of the geologic, petrophysical, and reservoir data associated with nearby wells provides parameters that characterize the initial production, the production decline (decline curve), and ultimate production. Using these numbers to extrapolate, reservoir engineers can then estimate the potential of extension wells or new prospecting areas, and decide if further drilling is economically feasible.

Conducting Comparisons of Existing Wells Within a Field or Reservoir

Conceptually, this type of analysis is similar to the above, using relevant reservoir data, but conducted on an ongoing basis by a field development/production asset team. The objective is production optimization for existing wells. The critical data is the ongoing production information for oil, gas, and water that conveys the long-term economic viability of a well or the entire field.
In addition to production data, geologic, petrophysical, and operational data are useful in comparing performance. Well logs, completion information, pump operations, and maintenance, data provide insight when comparing the performance of wells within a reservoir. When production engineers encounter problems in a well, comparison with the history and performance of other wells can help identify the source of the problem as well as the solution.

Detecting and Identifying Production Issues

If production issues have developed suddenly and the reservoir looks similar to the surrounding wells the most common assumption is mechanical issues. Checking maintenance records associated with the well may reveal unplanned downtime for pump repair or degradation in other infrastructure assets that temporarily impact production.
A gradual change in production metrics (rates, pressure, cut) is usually indicative of reservoir changes (as indicated by geologic and petrophysical models) such as fluid or gas blocks, or encroachment from recently-drilled wells. Historical analysis and comparison of nearby wells can uncover similar problems encountered in the past, as well as provide detailed guidance regarding practical resolutions.

Required: Access to All Relevant Reservoir and Operational Data

Useful comparisons of well performance data are predicated on reservoir engineers having access to all relevant data associated with reservoirs and wells. This includes geologic, seismic, geophysical, petrophysical, well logs, completions, production, and operational infrastructure. Access to all of these data allows reservoir engineers to conduct well performance comparisons and identify correlations that help predict economic potential, diagnose performance issues, and propose practical solutions.
For many operators, however, obtaining access to these data and integrating them into an environment that facilitates collaborative visualization and analysis is the most significant barrier to well performance comparisons.

CoViz 4D for Well Performance Comparisons

CoViz 4D overcomes these barriers by easily integrating a wide range of data used by the different disciplines of an asset team. All of the data types mentioned above are made accessible via a Data Registry. CoViz 4D automatically converts the various data formats into a common format and presents them in a 3D and 4D visualization environment. Additionally, CoViz 4D provides a wide range of analytic tools to help engineers compare reservoir and well attributes that affect performance.
Often, well performance analysis continues for years and involves many different professionals involved. CoViz 4D can manage data chronologically so that historical information from existing wells can be directly compared with the latest information. The ability to visualize the evolution of wells over time is a powerful way to compare well performance.
With immediate access to relevant data, powerful visualization capabilities, and a rich analytic toolset, reservoir teams can collaboratively compare geologic data, petrophysical properties, reservoir parameters, production data, and operational information. The insight gained through well performance comparisons helps to more accurately estimate recovery and develop plans to maximize production.

CoViz 4D, a data visualization analytics software from Dynamic Graphics Inc., gives oil and gas professionals the ability to easily access and combine all relevant data associated with petroleum assets. Powerful visualization capabilities enable you to explore data relationships and conduct well performance comparisons, allowing your team to confidently make decisions on the field that positively impact profit and reduce operational risk. To learn more about CoViz 4D contact our team.


Scaling 3D Seismic Data Analysis from Laptops to Visualization Centers

Multiple coordinated views of the same reservoir. Different reservoir attributes shown as well as 4D seismic and a 3D structural model showing the individual sand bodies. Data used with permission of owner.One of the essential aspects of visualization is the ability...

Depth Conversion of 3D Seismic Data Through Visualization

Time-domain on top with a velocity cube, seismic cube, and interpreted horizons. Depth domain below with the depth-converted seismic cube, wells, well tops, and reservoir simulation grid derived from the depth-converted horizons. Data used by permission of the...

Application of Real-Time Well Monitoring for Optimized Productivity

Real-time monitoring of reservoir fluids integrated with simulation models and 4D seismic with CoViz 4D allows asset teams to efficiently manage and optimize problem-solving and productivity.Reservoir teams obtain a better understanding of well production when...

Petrophysical Data Analysis: Integrating Geologic and Geophysical Data

In the oil and gas industry, retrieving accurate information regarding subsurface characteristics in a reservoir is especially critical for the role engineers and geoscientists play on an asset team. The ability to associate information obtained from various...

Visually Optimizing Big Data in the Oil and Gas Industry

Integrating large volumes of seismic, reservoir simulation and production data is paramount to optimizing big data analytics. Data used with permission of owner.Enhanced computing power, and instrumentation of production assets have fostered the acquisition and...

An Integrated Approach to Seismic Forward Modeling

Schematic illustrating how the CoViz Sim2Seis workflow, tightly coupled with qualitative and quantitative analysis in the CoViz 4D Viewer, offers seismic history-matching capabilities.Seismic forward modeling is an important step to better understand complex...

Seismic Reservoir Monitoring Through Visualization

An ideal design, development, and management plan for hydrocarbon asset development comes from having a better understanding of  all known geological and petrophysical aspects of the subsurface. But given the dynamic nature of the reservoir and its attributes, petroleum professionals can encounter some complexities in the process of in-depth analysis.

Share on Social Media